JCSAI | Journal of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence
← Back to Volume 8, Issue 1

A Review of Recent Advances in Control Algorithms for Stewart Platforms

Hemin Zhang, Lin Wang
Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 55-61, 2026 DOI: 10.54097/r3ar0h87 July 28, 2026
Download PDF
Abstract.The Stewart platform is a typical six-degree-of-freedom parallel mechanism characterized by high load-carrying capacity, high structural stiffness, a short error propagation chain, and fast dynamic response. It has been widely used in motion simulation, ship motion compensation, space payload pointing, precision machining, and multidimensional vibration control. Because the moving platform is cooperatively driven by six kinematic chains, its control system exhibits pronounced nonlinearity, strong coupling, and multivariable characteristics, and is affected by factors such as mechanical clearance, load variations, actuator saturation, sensor noise, and model parameter errors. Although conventional proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control has a simple structure and is easy to implement in engineering applications, it often struggles to simultaneously achieve high tracking accuracy, fast response, and stable operation under complex attitude variations and persistent external disturbances. In recent years, methods such as model predictive control, sliding mode control, adaptive control, robust control, neural networks, and reinforcement learning have gradually been introduced into Stewart platform systems. This review examines recent control strategies for Stewart platforms against four practical criteria: model requirements, disturbance rejection, constraint handling, and computational demand. The discussion also covers the validation methods and application conditions reported in marine compensation, motion simulation, aerospace positioning, precision machining, and vibration isolation. Particular attention is given to unresolved issues in modeling accuracy, sensing delay, real-time implementation, safety, and the generalization of learning-based controllers.
Keywords. Stewart platform parallel robot motion control model predictive control sliding mode control neural network wave-induced motion compensation
APA Citation Hemin Zhang, Lin Wang (2026). A Review of Recent Advances in Control Algorithms for Stewart Platforms. Journal of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, 8(1), 55-61. https://doi.org/10.54097/r3ar0h87

References

  1. Wang, M., Zhang, Y., Liang, Q., et al. (2025). Development status and frontier applications of Stewart parallel intelligent robots. Chinese Journal of Nature, 47(5), 360–372. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0253-9608.2025.05.004 (In Chinese)
  2. Liang, F. C., Zhao, X. L., Tan, S., et al. (2022). Pose resolution analysis method for a Stewart six-degree-of-freedom parallel mechanism. Journal of Changchun University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 45(6), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-9870.2022.06.017 (In Chinese)
  3. Xie, B., Dai, S., & Liu, F. (2021). A Lie group-based iterative algorithm framework for numerically solving forward kinematics of Gough-Stewart platform. Mathematics, 9(7), 757. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9070757
  4. Fang, X. G., Zhang, W., Zheng, M. L., et al. (2021). Parametric modeling and optimization of a six-degree-of-freedom Stewart platform. Journal of Harbin University of Science and Technology, 26(1), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.15938/j.jhust.2021.01.010 (In Chinese)
  5. Lu, Z. Q., Wu, D., Ding, H., et al. (2021). Vibration isolation and energy harvesting integrated in a Stewart platform with high static and low dynamic stiffness. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 89, 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2020.07.060
  6. Zhang, T. T., Zhao, X., Ni, X., et al. (2021). Development and optimization of a six-degree-of-freedom Stewart platform for driving simulation devices. Industrial Technology Innovation, 8(5), 109–113. https://doi.org/10.14103/j.issn.2095-8412.2021.10.019 (In Chinese)
  7. Santos Arconada, V., García-Barruetabeña, J., & Haas, R. (2023). Validation of a ride comfort simulation strategy on an electric Stewart platform for real road driving applications. Journal of Low Frequency Noise, Vibration and Active Control, 42(1), 368–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/14613484221122109
  8. Li, D., Wang, S., Song, X., et al. (2024). A BP-neural-network-based PID control algorithm of shipborne Stewart platform for wave compensation. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 12(12), 2160. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12122160
  9. Yi, S., Zhang, Q., Sun, X., et al. (2023). Simultaneous micropositioning and microvibration control of a magnetostrictive Stewart platform with synthesized strategy. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 187, 109925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109925
  10. Ma, T., Li, T., Jing, G., et al. (2022). Development of a novel seat suspension based on the cubic Stewart parallel mechanism and magnetorheological fluid damper. Applied Sciences, 12(22), 11437. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122211437
  11. Chen, X., Zhu, H., Yin, J., et al. (2023). A NTSMCLF attitude tracking controller for the satellite with flexible accessories based on the Stewart platform. In Proceedings of the 42nd Chinese Control Conference (pp. 3006–3011). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.23919/ccc58697.2023.10239867
  12. Dong, A. L., Lyu, L. L., Cai, G. P., et al. (2022). Dynamics modeling and integrated attitude pointing control of a Stewart platform satellite. Chinese Space Science and Technology, 42(6), 79–88. (In Chinese)
  13. Du, L., Luo, Y., Ji, L., et al. (2025). Comprehensive parametric model and decoupling design of a Stewart platform for a large spaceborne optical load. Acta Astronautica, 226, 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.11.036
  14. Zhao, J., Xu, Z., Wu, D., et al. (2025). Six-DoF Stewart platform motion simulator control using switchable model predictive control. arXiv:2503.11300. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.11300
  15. Chadha, A., Jain, V., Rios Lazcano, A. M., et al. (2023). Computationally-efficient motion cueing algorithm via model predictive control. arXiv:2304.03232. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.03232
  16. Zhu, H., Xu, W., Huang, J., et al. (2024). DisGNet: A distance graph neural network for forward kinematics learning of Gough-Stewart platform. arXiv:2402.09077. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.09077
  17. Maldonado, A., Bueno, C., Loza, D., et al. (2021). Design, construction and implementation of Stewart platform with control of rolling ball on platform through artificial vision. arXiv:2105.10963. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.10963
  18. Scheidel, H., Asadi, H., Bellmann, T., et al. (2024). A deep reinforcement learning based motion cueing algorithm for vehicle driving simulation. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 73(7), 9696–9705. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2024.3375941
  19. Gonzalez Arango, C., Asadi, H., Chalak Qazani, M. R., et al. (2025). Learning-based approximate nonlinear model predictive control motion cueing. arXiv:2504.00469. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.00469
  20. Ketchum, J., Avtges, J., Schlafly, M., et al. (2025). Force and speed in a soft Stewart platform. arXiv:2504.13127. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.13127
  21. Avtges, J., Ketchum, J., Schlafly, M., et al. (2025). Real-time reinforcement learning for dynamic tasks with a parallel soft robot. In 2025 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (pp. 5537–5544). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS60139.2025.11246440
  22. Cinun, B. C. G., Tamba, T. A., Santjoko, I. R., et al. (2025). End-to-end design and validation of a low-cost Stewart platform with nonlinear estimation and control. arXiv:2510.22949. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.22949
  23. Cinun, B. C. G., Tamba, T. A., Santjoko, I. R., et al. (2025). Design and experimental validation of closed-form CBF-based safe control for Stewart platform under multiple constraints. arXiv:2512.11125. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.11125
  24. Kazezkhan, G., Xu, Q., Wang, N., et al. (2023). Performance analysis and optimization of a modified Stewart platform for the Qitai radio telescope. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 23(9), 095022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/ace1d5
  25. Liang, F., Tan, S., Fan, J., et al. (2021). Design and implementation of a high precision Stewart platform for a space camera. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2101, 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2101/1/012015
  26. Sun, K., Tang, J., Wu, Z., et al. (2024). Coupled nonlinear vibration characteristics of quasi-zero-stiffness Gough-Stewart isolation platform. Aerospace Science and Technology, 152, 109352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2024.109352
  27. Pu, Z. X., Lin, J. H., Guo, J. W., et al. (2025). Performance analysis and optimization of a 6-UPS parallel machine tool. Machine Design and Research, 41(1), 123–127. (In Chinese)
  28. Karmakar, S., & Turner, C. J. (2024). A literature review on Stewart-Gough platform calibrations. Journal of Mechanical Design, 146(8), 050801. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064487
  29. Jiang, S. T. (2019). Research on the motion control system of a general aviation flight simulator [Master’s thesis]. Hebei University of Science and Technology. (In Chinese)
  30. Yin, D. W., Sun, P., & Zhai, H. Y. (2012). Research on the development of flight simulators and flight simulation training. In Proceedings of the Seventh Jilin Provincial Science and Technology Academic Annual Conference: Innovation-Driven Development and Acceleration of Strategic Emerging Industries (pp. 243–245). Jilin Association for Science and Technology. (In Chinese)
  31. Andrievsky, B., Kazunin, D. V., Kostygova, D. M., et al. (2014). Control of pneumatically actuated 6-DOF Stewart platform for driving simulator. In 2014 19th International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR) (pp. 663–668). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/MMAR.2014.6957433